Student Researchers' Society Topics

Co-supervisor: HANDLER-NÉMETH, Judit

The reliability of systematic reviews for decision-making depends on the quality of evidence provided by primary studies, as well as on the methodological rigor of the reviews themselves. Well-developed, publicly available systematic review protocols support high-quality implementation, reduce the risk of bias, enhance transparency, and avoid unnecessary duplication. However, limited evidence exists regarding how systematic reviews in the nutrition field are planned and documented. Therefore, the aim of the study is to assess the planning process of nutrition-related systematic reviews.

The results of clinical trials are often only partially transferable to everyday clinical practice. To address this limitation, pragmatic clinical research and analyses based on routinely collected healthcare data are gaining increasing importance. The aim of our study is to comprehensively evaluate the characteristics, applicability, effectiveness, and dissemination of these types of investigations.

Research conducted in emergency care involves several specific challenges, including time-critical decision making, limited possibilities for patient follow-up, and strict ethical requirements. The defined research topic focuses on identifying and developing research methods that are suitable for addressing these difficulties.